Home Politics The LGA's Screaming Lunacy About Profits At Children's Homes

The LGA’s Screaming Lunacy About Profits At Children’s Homes

Author

Comments

The Guardian tells us of a new report from the Local Government Association talking of the extreme – capitalist, bourgeois even! – profits being made by the private homes that care for children on the local authority dome. This cannot stand, bring it all back in house and so on.

Except that the report is such screaming abdabs that not even Richard Murphy would agree with the accounting here.

Councils have called for financial oversight of England’s privately-run children’s care homes after research showed some of the biggest private equity-owned providers were collectively making hundreds of millions a year in profits.

The Local Government Association (LGA) also warned that the increasing indebtedness of some of the largest private providers risked triggering a Southern Cross-style financial collapse, potentially leaving vulnerable children without a home.

“Providers should … not be making excessive profit from providing placements for children,” said Judith Blake, chair of the LGA’s Children and Young People board.

Nationalise it all!

A study published on Friday by the LGA found the six biggest private children’s care providers made £219m in profits last year.

Some providers recorded profits of more than 20% of income,

Lampposts! Piano wire!

So, we go look at the report and this is the calculation we find:

The largest twenty provider organisations studied in this project have income of
£1.54 billion, an increasing proportion of the spending by local authorities on
fostering, children’s homes, and other social care services including residential
school places and leaving care.

Aggregate profits measured using the popular EBITDA method (Earnings before
Interest, Depreciation and Amortisation) amount to £265 million at an EBITDA
margin of 17.2%.

No, that is it. They do not then go on to give us net profit figures.

Think this through for a moment. So, you’re going to run a home. Doesn’t really matter which sort of home. You need to buy a home. A mortgage is the normal way of doing this. Mortgages require the payment of interest. Further, you’ve got to maintain the home – that depreciation. So, two of the large – not necessarily largest, but large – expenses aren’t being included in our estimation of the profit.

They’re telling us something close to the operating profit, not the total profit. Another way to put this is to say that they’re looking at the current budget and not the capital one.

That’s bad enough. But the very same report goes on to say:

it said, while four of the seven largest provider groups had debt and liability levels that exceeded their assets.

Yes, they’re both claiming massive profit margins and also vast debt levels. They do this by removing the costs of debt from the profits.

It’s left as an exercise for the reader to calculate local authority budgets without interest or maintenance. Think how low council tax can go!

SUPPORT US WITH A SUBSCRIPTION?

3 COMMENTS

  1. This Judith Blake… is this the former leader of Leeds City Council, is this soon-to-be Baroness Blake? (mother of former councillor Olivia Blake, now Olivia Blake MP ) Complaining about how dispicable local councils allow evil capitalist financiers to her city’s children’s homes? If she wanted to own, operate, and run her city’s childrens homes she should have gone ahead and done it.

  2. Warren Buffett said one should always beware of pepole who talk about EBITDA rather than real, end-of-the-day, bottom-line profit.

    “So who pays for these necessary costs of doing business? The EBITDA fairy?”

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

expunct

in British English
expunct (ɪkˈspʌŋkt)
VERB (transitive)
1. to delete or erase; blot out; obliterate
2. to wipe out or destroy

Support Us

Recent posts

American Hyperconsumerism Is Killing Fewer People!

This report does not say what the Guardian headline writers think it does: Three Americans create enough carbon emissions to kill one person, study finds The...

Contracts Often Lag New Revenue Streams

I've been - vaguely and not with any great interest - anticipating a story like this: Scarlett Johansson sues Walt Disney over Marvel’s Black Widow...

Richard Murphy Rediscovers Monetarism

We have a delightful example of how Richard Murphy simply doesn't understand the basic nuts and bolts of the economics he wants to impose...

Vox Is Missing The Point About Having A Constitution

Not that we should be all that surprised by this from the progressives at Vox. No government- well, no one not controlled by...

So Let’s Have An Elitist Technocracy Instead!

There's been a certain amount - OK, a lot - of squealing in the US about how democracy is the ultimate value and we...

Recent comments