Home Politics The Horrible Bit About The EU's New Naughty Step For Recalcitrant Member...

The Horrible Bit About The EU’s New Naughty Step For Recalcitrant Member Countries

Author

Comments

Quite how power slips away into an unaccountable structure divorced from the demos depends. Depends upon who is doing it and when. For certain of the Puritans it was that the Elect – a self-proclaimed grouping of those who agreed on the Meaning of the Book – decided for everyone because they were right. Among the communists it was that the Elect – a self-proclaimed grouping of those who agreed on the Meaning of the Book – decided for everyone because they were right. Entirely different, d’ye see?

In the European Union it’s who gets to receive the money being shelled out:

Brussels will be able to block budget payments to rogue EU governments that undermine the rule of law or the independence of judges, under a hard-fought agreement between the European parliament and member states.

In what was described as the “end of a painful phase” for the EU, a provisional deal has been struck, which will allow a qualified majority of member states to impose sanctions where governments fail to maintain democratic standards.

Seems fair enough, right? If Adolf did return from that submarine base in Antarctica then we’ not want Brussels money to be lavished on the new soap factories, would we? So, right on. Except:

A suspension of payments from the bloc’s seven-year budget and coronavirus recovery fund could be enforced in response to “breaches of the principles of the rule of law in a member state” or where governments “seriously risk affecting the sound financial management of the EU budget or the protection of the financial interests of the EU”.

You can squeeze just about anything you like into that second set of circumstances. Protection of the financial interests of the EU? Well, recommending a smaller EU budget would be against such interests, wouldn’t it? Having a referendum to leave? Seriously, you could fit anything that isn’t quite the current fashionable Brussels nostrum into that. Which does mean that the power to punish opposition to the current fashionable Brussels nostrum has just been handed to Brussels.

Sure, I’m stretching just a bit but which governance system hasn’t eventually expanded to use all of the powers even vaguely granted to it?

SUPPORT US WITH A SUBSCRIPTION?

6 COMMENTS

  1. “the sound financial management of the EU budget”

    Is there such a thing? I thought the European Parliament hadn’t signed off the accounts since Pontius was a pilot.

  2. I know the Poles are short of a bob or two ‘cos all the bright young things fucked off 20 years ago but why don’t they just tell Brussels to fuck off? Last time I was in Krakow there were plenty of well paid tech jobs in trendy offices with young people working on Mac laptops. A couple more years of that and they won’t care about the handouts.

  3. A couple more years of that and they won’t care about the handouts.

    Those handouts are coming to an end during the EU budget 2021-2027 period and the vast majority will be net contributors rather than net recipients. I suspect a lot of EU countries will be eyeing the exit door and watching how the UK does after BRExit (or “despite BRExit”).

    The EU could easily lose the Visegrád Group (Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia) who are the ones being targeted by the new “naughty step” rules. If the Netherlands or Italy were to leave, that would be another matter…

  4. None of the Visegrad group countries can stand on their own IMO, an alternative needs to be created for them to leave the EU.

  5. None of the Visegrad group countries can stand on their own IMO, an alternative needs to be created for them to leave the EU.

    A North Atlantic Free Trade Area which stuck to just trade could be a good idea. Open membership to those countries that are a) members of NATO and fulfil the defence spending requirements; and b) not members of the EU.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

expunct

in British English
expunct (ɪkˈspʌŋkt)
VERB (transitive)
1. to delete or erase; blot out; obliterate
2. to wipe out or destroy

Support Us

Recent posts

American Hyperconsumerism Is Killing Fewer People!

This report does not say what the Guardian headline writers think it does: Three Americans create enough carbon emissions to kill one person, study finds The...

Contracts Often Lag New Revenue Streams

I've been - vaguely and not with any great interest - anticipating a story like this: Scarlett Johansson sues Walt Disney over Marvel’s Black Widow...

Richard Murphy Rediscovers Monetarism

We have a delightful example of how Richard Murphy simply doesn't understand the basic nuts and bolts of the economics he wants to impose...

Vox Is Missing The Point About Having A Constitution

Not that we should be all that surprised by this from the progressives at Vox. No government- well, no one not controlled by...

So Let’s Have An Elitist Technocracy Instead!

There's been a certain amount - OK, a lot - of squealing in the US about how democracy is the ultimate value and we...

Recent comments