Home Labour Explaining Anti-Semitism Within Labour - Its Just Anti-Capitalist

Explaining Anti-Semitism Within Labour – Its Just Anti-Capitalist



Several explanations have been offered to account for the anti-Semitism that plagues sections of the Labour Party. More than one of them might be valid. For example, there is within the Labour Party an element characterized by a visceral rejection of all things Western and capitalist. Since Israel is both of these to some extent, they reject what it stands for, and equate pro-Jewish as pro-Israel.

Similarly, support for the aims of the Palestinian peoples is seen as supporting the underdog against the might of an oppressive capitalist predator bent on conquest and oppression. Both elements explain some, but not all, of anti-Semitism within Labour’s ranks. But there is a much larger element, one people find it difficult to discuss. It is the elephant in the room that people pretend is not there, and the name of that elephant is Islam.

In a significant number of parliamentary seats in the UK, a Labour majority depends on a Muslim vote that breaks heavily in its favour. Labour candidates can bid for that vote by expressing anti-Israeli and, by association, anti-Jewish sentiments and prejudices. Jeremy Corbyn and his allies know that a future Labour government can only be achieved with Muslim support, and from this derives their reluctance to condemn the virulent anti-Semitic groups and their spokespersons.

Of course, educated and cultured Muslims are no more prone to bigoted prejudice than their educated and cultured Christian counterparts, but in neither groups do these constitute a majority. Fanaticism is there to be bid for, and so long as Labour bids for it, it will be plagued by anti-Semitism. The elephant is still there, even if everyone agrees not to look at it or to name it.



  1. Well, yes.

    This was why I could never see why Barmy got a hard on over the Arab Spring. If the new governments were more democratic, and properly represented the opinions of their people, they’d be virulently anti-white and anti-Western.

    But if a new dictator simply mangled, murdered and mutilated his way to power, all we’d need to do would be to congratulate him on his gaining control by solely peaceful and democratic means as he squelched towards us through the blood and guts, picking his teeth with the bones of butchered babies. We could then offer him the same bribe—-oops foreign aid, as we’d been giving the old one if he was prepared to play ball.

    So the solution in this instance was simply to do nothing, as that Master Bureaucrat Adam Smith recommended.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here


in British English
expunct (ɪkˈspʌŋkt)
VERB (transitive)
1. to delete or erase; blot out; obliterate
2. to wipe out or destroy

Support Us

Recent posts

To Introduce Environmentalists To Political Reality

Grist is part of that unthinking - the fat and thick end - of environmentalism. Which is why they ask questions like this: Why won’t...

Sperm Counts May Well Be Falling, Yes

A new reason we should all do something - or stop doing some other thing - which is that sperm counts are falling. If...

So, Revera Dodges Taxes, Does It?

Another one of the tax justice groupuscules wishes to tell us that Revera - a manager of care homes - dodges UK taxation. As we'd...

Free Speech Means The Liberty To Be A Pinhead

The Establishment - whichever one there is at any time - has been determined to beat back the threat of free speech ever since...

Just How Stupid Can You Be About British Recovery Bonds?

This Starmer idea of British Recovery Bonds. Or, as Richard Murphy is claiming, his idea of stealing everyones' savings. It's possible to wonder at...

Recent comments