Home Labour Explaining Anti-Semitism Within Labour - Its Just Anti-Capitalist

Explaining Anti-Semitism Within Labour – Its Just Anti-Capitalist



Several explanations have been offered to account for the anti-Semitism that plagues sections of the Labour Party. More than one of them might be valid. For example, there is within the Labour Party an element characterized by a visceral rejection of all things Western and capitalist. Since Israel is both of these to some extent, they reject what it stands for, and equate pro-Jewish as pro-Israel.

Similarly, support for the aims of the Palestinian peoples is seen as supporting the underdog against the might of an oppressive capitalist predator bent on conquest and oppression. Both elements explain some, but not all, of anti-Semitism within Labour’s ranks. But there is a much larger element, one people find it difficult to discuss. It is the elephant in the room that people pretend is not there, and the name of that elephant is Islam.

In a significant number of parliamentary seats in the UK, a Labour majority depends on a Muslim vote that breaks heavily in its favour. Labour candidates can bid for that vote by expressing anti-Israeli and, by association, anti-Jewish sentiments and prejudices. Jeremy Corbyn and his allies know that a future Labour government can only be achieved with Muslim support, and from this derives their reluctance to condemn the virulent anti-Semitic groups and their spokespersons.

Of course, educated and cultured Muslims are no more prone to bigoted prejudice than their educated and cultured Christian counterparts, but in neither groups do these constitute a majority. Fanaticism is there to be bid for, and so long as Labour bids for it, it will be plagued by anti-Semitism. The elephant is still there, even if everyone agrees not to look at it or to name it.



  1. Well, yes.

    This was why I could never see why Barmy got a hard on over the Arab Spring. If the new governments were more democratic, and properly represented the opinions of their people, they’d be virulently anti-white and anti-Western.

    But if a new dictator simply mangled, murdered and mutilated his way to power, all we’d need to do would be to congratulate him on his gaining control by solely peaceful and democratic means as he squelched towards us through the blood and guts, picking his teeth with the bones of butchered babies. We could then offer him the same bribe—-oops foreign aid, as we’d been giving the old one if he was prepared to play ball.

    So the solution in this instance was simply to do nothing, as that Master Bureaucrat Adam Smith recommended.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here


in British English
expunct (ɪkˈspʌŋkt)
VERB (transitive)
1. to delete or erase; blot out; obliterate
2. to wipe out or destroy

Support Us

Recent posts

Getting The Rise Of The Billionaires Wrong

Much ink is spilled these days on the iniquitous rise of the number of billionaires. Some of this is just silly, With 2% inflation...

The Iniquity Of Utilities Asking People To Pay For Their Power

The Guardian gives us one of those lovely, deliberate, misrepresentations of an economic situation. The way this story is written the evil capitalists are...

They Never Will Make The Connection, No

American Prospect is the usual sorta left wing, progressive, type place. Government, especially the Federal government, should be put in charge of much more...

Green New Deal – These People Are Ignorant

The Green New Deal group has decided to favour us with their recommendations for how to make the UK a better place. Given who...

These People Are Mad – Rare Earths And Electronics Recycling

We're being told that we must waste resources in order to save resources. This is, of course, mad but then that's the institutional part...

Recent comments