Home Feminism To Disagree With A Woman is Sexism Now, Is It?

To Disagree With A Woman is Sexism Now, Is It?



Apparently this tweet from Leeds United is evidence of sexism:

To disagree with, to make fun of, a woman apparently being that, sexism, these days.

To make fun of a woman because she is a woman could be exactly that. To make fun of the football statements of a female football pundit though? Without bringing the female bit into it at all?

But yes, this is apparently the new definition:

How did Leeds United not realise what would happen when they targeted a woman?
Suzanne Wrack

Target? If you get paid to stand in front of the cameras then you do indeed have to take what people say about what you’ve said in front of the cameras. That’s the job.

By going after the pundit Karen Carney the club’s official Twitter account opened the door to the sexist abuse that affects every woman in football

That is taking the claim further. We cannot disagree with a woman because there are mouthbreathers out there. So much for strong and independent women standing on their own two feet in a modern society then.

Twitter went into meltdown. There were plenty of comments from fans proudly proclaiming they had trumped the feminists. This was not an attack on Carney because she is a woman, but because she is a bad pundit and she was wrong. How did they know? Because the club had tweeted pedantically about male pundits in the past. Many pointed out that Gabby Agbonlahor, Paul Merson and Chris Wilder have also been targeted in recent months.

In the case of Carney, though, the club plunged new depths. Did they not realise the abuse directed at her would be different because she is a woman?

That really is the argument being made. We should not critique a woman in the performance of her job – not critique her being a woman but the performance of the job itself – because there are mouthbreathers out there.

We’ve some way to go before cultural equality, no? And yes, I do speak as someone who has been roundly, soundly, abused in comments sections and upon Twitter. Amazingly, some people don’t like some parts of my analysis of the world either.

Anyone recall the Colemanballs column?



    • Which will end the moment they drop the big one or Britain finally collapses into social anarchy and barbarism. This whole Feminazi experiment was only ever going to end very, very badly.

  1. There has been a Twitter storm re Scottish Labour MSP Neil Findlay claiming that SNP MP Christina McKelvie wasn’t clever enough to come up with a Tweet re Bill Cash, Alexander the Great and Aristotle. This has been interpreted as misogynistic by some as well! Essentially it appears we have to treat them like a man until we don’t…?


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here


in British English
expunct (ɪkˈspʌŋkt)
VERB (transitive)
1. to delete or erase; blot out; obliterate
2. to wipe out or destroy

Support Us

Recent posts

So Bjorn Lomborg Is Proven Right Once Again

Back when Bjorn Lomborg brought out the Sceptical Environmentalist my word how people laughed. He pointed out that well, actually, solar power had been...

So, That Answers The Question About Arun Advani Then

Arun Advani was on that Wealth Tax Commission. You know, the one that ended up saying that it would be just fine to have...

An Entirely Absurd Insistence About Oil Company Pay

The claim is that as oil company CEOs are paid with stock therefore they conspire to boil the planet. That is, no really, what...

Big Meat Is The Next Enemy After Big Oil

We would, perhaps, hope for a little more logical ability among those who write the newspapers and news sites for us. Take this example...

In Praise Of Benign, Even Helpful, Beneficial, Tax Competition

Richard Murphy tells us that it is not possible for there to be anything other than harmful tax competition. All such competition must, by...

Recent comments