Home Feminism Let's Have Paid Childcare To Solve The Servant Problem

Let’s Have Paid Childcare To Solve The Servant Problem



That someone, somewhere, needs to take care of the children is just one of those things about the human condition. We’re marked, as a species, by neoteny and the excessively long childhood that results. OK, so, a solution is needed.

The current insistence is that poor women should be hired, at the expense of all, to take care of the children of rich women. That’s not quite what is said but it is what is meant. The insistence is, that is, that someone should get on with solving the servant problem.

This would be very mice for middle class women, of course it would, but it’s not entirely certain why everyone should be paying for this insistence to their benefit. The latest report claiming that this must be done contains this delightful line:

In addition to reducing the undue burden of care, affordable and quality childcare frees mothers to participate in the labor force and creates jobs for women in the childcare sector.

We don’t really seem to have achieved all that much there, do we? By their own approbation, plan, they’re insisting that women will be taking care of children. It’s just that it’ll be one set of women taking care of the children of another set rather than each taking care of their own. Which doesn’t seem to be, not massively at least, a significant change in the original complaint, that women have to do much of the childcare.

What will happen though is as follows. Childcare isn’t a notably highly paid occupation. The reason for that is obvious, there are billions of people across the world entirely capable of doing it. Something in high supply tends not to achieve a high price. So, it will be poorer women – they’ll be getting low wages, so they will by doing it be poorer – who end up doing the childcare. It will be higher paid women who get to go off an design diversity training courses while their kids are taken care of.

We will, in short, solve the servant problem.

It’s not obvious that this is an advance in society. Although, of course, it has the wholehearted support of all middle class women and thus of most of the men who wake up to them which is why we’re probably going to get it even if we shouldn’t.



Comments are closed.


in British English
expunct (ɪkˈspʌŋkt)
VERB (transitive)
1. to delete or erase; blot out; obliterate
2. to wipe out or destroy

Support Us

Recent posts

Agatha has been published.

Aunt Agatha has been published (the money came from an anonymous donor). It was £2500+ If you'd like a copy, donate £10+ and you'll get...

American Hyperconsumerism Is Killing Fewer People!

This report does not say what the Guardian headline writers think it does: Three Americans create enough carbon emissions to kill one person, study finds The...

Contracts Often Lag New Revenue Streams

I've been - vaguely and not with any great interest - anticipating a story like this: Scarlett Johansson sues Walt Disney over Marvel’s Black Widow...

Richard Murphy Rediscovers Monetarism

We have a delightful example of how Richard Murphy simply doesn't understand the basic nuts and bolts of the economics he wants to impose...

Vox Is Missing The Point About Having A Constitution

Not that we should be all that surprised by this from the progressives at Vox. No government- well, no one not controlled by...

Recent comments