Home Environment John Oliver On Plastics Pollution - Not Quite Getting It

John Oliver On Plastics Pollution – Not Quite Getting It



John Oliver manages – again – to not quite grasp the basic point he’s trying to make. For he says that sure, the polluter must pay. Pay for cleaning up pollution that is, or at least the wider societal costs of that pollution. Entirely agreed, people who impose costs upon the rest of us should be the people who bear those costs. This is just externalities all over again.

Oliver advocated for thoughtful, targeted bans of single-use plastics (bags and takeout containers), and extended producer responsibility (EPR) laws that would shift responsibility and the costs of collection from the public sector to the actual producers of plastic waste.

But the people who are the producers of plastic waste are you and me. To the extent – not much to be honest, most ocean plastic is discarded fishing equipment – that consumer packaging is part of the cause of it all anyway.

Yet “frustratingly, the plastic industry’s response to all the damage you’ve seen is to make a big show of tiny improvement and then revert to what they’ve always done, which is heavily push the idea that if we as consumers simply tried hard enough, we could make our plastic problem go away,” said Oliver. But “our personal behavior is not the main culprit here, despite what the plastics industry has spent decades and millions of dollars trying to convince us.”

It is, exactly and wholly, our personal behaviour which causes the problem. We are the people who like plastic wrapped cucumbers – because they don’t rot so fast – and bags that don’t fall apart in the rain. If there was no consumer demand for these things then plastic wouldn’t even exist let alone get used.

It’s that infantilisation of us all again. Bad things happen in the economy because the capitalists force it upon us. Poverty exists because it is created rather than being the natural condition of mankind. Plastics pollution occurs because oil companies force feed it to us rather than because we choose to have the benefits. It’s always they doing it to us. The conspirazoid explanation of life that is.

Seriously folks, grow up. It is out aggregate behaviour that determines the world around us, that means it’s up to us to change that behaviour if we want to change that world.



  1. Is he advocating going back to washing out condoms, or is there some things that are acceptable to be wrapped in single-use plastic?


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here


in British English
expunct (ɪkˈspʌŋkt)
VERB (transitive)
1. to delete or erase; blot out; obliterate
2. to wipe out or destroy

Support Us

Recent posts

In Praise Of Benign, Even Helpful, Beneficial, Tax Competition

Richard Murphy tells us that it is not possible for there to be anything other than harmful tax competition. All such competition must, by...

If Women Working Causes Inflation Then Women Must Be Less Productive Workers Than Men

Over at Politico there is the assertion that one reason for past inflation was that women joined the workforce. If there are more people...

The Point Of Inventions Is To Be Able To Use Them, Not Sell Them

This is a common complaint about the British economy, that we can invent things but don;t then go on to make fortunes out of...

An Interesting Method Of Avoiding Tax Rises – Just Borrow

Those progressives over at American Prospect, it is possible to wonder whether they've quite got the basics of how the economy works at times. So,...

The Truth About Biden’s Tax Plan – It’s Based Upon Lies

So Richard Murphy told us how lovely the Biden corporate tax plan is over at FT Alphaville. I pointed out in the comments that...

Recent comments