Home Education The Education Policy Institute And Persistent Poverty

The Education Policy Institute And Persistent Poverty

Author

Comments

The Education Policy Institute wants to tell us that poorer children are falling further behind richer children in their educations. This is blamed upon the manner in which persistent poverty is rising. At which point we should all give a heartfelt cry of “Bullshit!”.

As The Guardian reports:

The gap between poor pupils and their wealthier classmates in England has stopped narrowing and gone into reverse for the first time in 12 years, even before the coronavirus pandemic hit, research has found.

In findings which will pile pressure on ministers to ensure a successful return to school, experts said the gap in primary school attainment has begun to widen because of rising levels of persistent poverty.

That’s the claim.

A key factor, the EPI says, is the rise in the proportion of pupils who live in persistent poverty, up from 34.8% in 2017 to 36.7% two years later.

That’s half the evidence, here’s the other half:

And how can we cry bullshit? By looking at the change in persistent poverty over a longer time period. From the ONS*:

As we can see the achievement gap bears no relation at all to the short term gyrations of the persistent poverty level. So, we cry bullshit therefore.

*Yes, that’s the poverty level in general, not among children alone, but still….

SUPPORT US WITH A SUBSCRIPTION?

3 COMMENTS

  1. The single biggest factor influencing how children perform in school (other than their own native ability, of course) is whether their parent(s) give a shit or not. The degree to which this might correlate with their poverty is hard to determine.

  2. T | N
    ONE THIRD of school children in poverty. I call bullshit.
    Four million children starving to death in cardboard boxes under bridges? Point to them.

    • ‘Poverty’ in the UK now means not having the latest iPhone/trainers. As Tim has often pointed out, Barbara Castle announced that real poverty had been eliminated back in the 60s.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

expunct

in British English
expunct (ɪkˈspʌŋkt)
VERB (transitive)
1. to delete or erase; blot out; obliterate
2. to wipe out or destroy

Support Us

Recent posts

The Difficulty Isn’t New Ways Of Lending, It’s People Worth Lending To

A more basic and fundamental point to be made concerning this lovely Greenshill and Gupta story. The difficulty is not in finding new ways...

How Dare People Be This Damn Stupid About Net Zero Emissions?

Assume that climate change is a problem, that we're causing it, that something must be done. OK, so, the aim must be to reduce...

It’s not right to make the poorest pay tax

In the Telegraph is this claim: We have created a weird, through-the-looking-glass tax system where a tiny number of the highest earners have paid most...

To Wildly Speculate About Gupta And Greenshill

Greenshill is a company that provides trade finance. No, don't worry about the details, just accept that. Greenshill also seems to be going bust...

Apparently Elizabeth Warren Is As Dumb As A Brick Outhouse

The Senator wants to tell us that stock buybacks are not returning money to investors: “They got a little fluff-and-buff in their stock. And how...

Recent comments