Home Economics Waitrose Has Solved The Chlorinated Chicken Problem For Us

Waitrose Has Solved The Chlorinated Chicken Problem For Us

Author

Comments

Apparently we must not be allowed to eat chlorinated chicken. So much so that we must not have a free trade deal with the United States because that is what we would all have forced down our throat if we did – that cluck drowned in a swimming pool.

This is, of course, nonsense. What would happen if we did have a free trade deal with the US is that those who prefer the cheaper price at the expense of the taste and the animal welfare standards will be able to have it. Those who want the animal welfare etc and are prepared to pay for it will also be able to have that. What won’t be happening is that those who desire the higher standards can force everyone else to pay for their preferences.

As I pointed out on Farming Today:

The full piece is here. Starting around 7.17.

There are those who disagree with this point of course but as they’re wrong we can ignore them.

We also have proof today of my contention. From Waitrose of all places:

Waitrose has insisted that it will never sell chlorinated chicken, hormone-treated beef or meat from animals subject to the extensive use of antibiotics as the upmarket grocer fired a warning at the government over a potential post-Brexit trade deal with the United States.

Isn’t that excellent? Those who desire those higher standards will always be able to access them. Those who don’t will be able to go elsewhere and get the cheaper food.

In fact, as we should put it, free trade is a victory for liberty and freedom. Because only by having free trade can we all gain what we desire. Some of us want cheap – great, free trade gives us that. Some of us want higher standards – great, free trade gives us that. The only people who will get pissed at the idea of free trade will be those who cannot force their desires and ideas upon the rest of us by banning the choice we do in fact want. And given that such standards fascists are anti-liberty and anti-freedom we can tell them to get out of town. Along with the horse they rode in on.

Free trade, it’s liberty in action.

- Advertisement -

3 COMMENTS

  1. In terms of consumption Tim, all true. But what if the argument is over animal welfare? Sometimes that can only be achieved with rules, stopping people from doing stuff, regardless of the financial benefits.

    • Well, yes, but – what if some portion of the people aren’t all that worried about animal welfare? Would prefer the cheap food rather than the more expensive? They are to be forced to pay more to support standards they don’t hold nor agree with, are they? The poor must have expensive chicken so that the Waitrose classes can feel good about their chickens?

  2. ‘ Waitrose has insisted that it will never sell chlorinated chicken, hormone-treated beef or meat from animals subject to the extensive use of antibiotics as the upmarket grocer fired a warning at the government.’

    Beware the ricochet Waitrose.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

expunct

in British English
expunct (ɪkˈspʌŋkt)
VERB (transitive)
1. to delete or erase; blot out; obliterate
2. to wipe out or destroy

Support Us

Recent posts

It’s The Consumer That Wins In Markets, Not The Supplier

The European Union has just had one of those lessons in freemarket capitalism that so many dislike. That it's the consumer that benefits from...

Finally The Woken SS Are Waking Up To Fast Fashion

It's taken them all long enough but finally the philosphically fashionable have finally woken up to what fast fashion means. Well, they've managed to...

The Difference Between Immigration And Asylum

There's a certain blurring here of the point of the system: People seeking asylum in the UK and Europe on the grounds of sexual orientation...

The Runnymede Trust And The Rugby Football Union

The Runnymede Trust is agitating for the Rugby Football Union to make more intensive studies of how many BAEM folk there are playing the...

If Only Polly Toynbee Actually Understood Anything

Polly Toynbee tells us that there should be a wealth tax. To, umm, well, do something or other: But what if, with one bound, we...

Recent comments