Home Economics This Is An Argument For More Black Politicians, Not More Black Economists

This Is An Argument For More Black Politicians, Not More Black Economists

Author

Comments

One piece of evidence about why the world is as screwed up as it is is this:

A lack of black economists is leading to an absence of passion is solving housing, education and employment inequalities, a Royal Society chief has said.
Prof Carol Propper said that greater ethnic diversity is needed among economic policy makers to ensure that the views of different communities are advocated.

That is a call for corporatist politics. Where it is the battle between interest groups which determines what policy should be. Corporatist policy making also has another name, fascism. So, no to that, thanks very much.

Prof Propper, president of the Royal Society of Economics, said that the underrepresentation of senior black economists is a problem when it comes to policy making.
“Diversity in economics is important because the key policy issues that the Government needs to address are so-called ‘wicked problems’ which are difficult to solve and require trade-offs,” she told The Daily Telegraph.
“If all policy advisors have exactly the same world view, then these trade-offs don’t get exposed.”
Prof Propper said that in order to address inequalities in health, access to jobs, training, employment and education, public policy must be drawn up by those who are “passionate” about such issues.
Having fewer black economists involved in forming policies means that these issues are “highlighted less” and are “brought to the fore less”, she said.
“The trade-offs need champions and that is why you need diversity of views and of passions,” Prof Propper added.

Explaining what policies do is the job of economists. If you do this then that will happen. We can take that a stage further too, here are the trade offs that have to be made – a higher minimum wage does mean higher wages for those who keep their jobs while reducing the number of people with jobs – and that too is a useful function of an economist.

But which trade offs should be done, where the balance is for a policy? That’s not economics, that’s politics. The economist can tell you if, then, but not should.

This is a call for there to be more black politicians deciding policy, not more black economists describing policy options. And that a Royal Society chief is ignorant of the difference here is a good example of why the world’s as screwed as it is.

SUPPORT US WITH A SUBSCRIPTION?

7 COMMENTS

  1. Well they tried — Thomas Sowell and Walter E Williams for example — but they obstinately refused to say what the beneficent white lefties wanted them to say.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

expunct

in British English
expunct (ɪkˈspʌŋkt)
VERB (transitive)
1. to delete or erase; blot out; obliterate
2. to wipe out or destroy

Support Us

Recent posts

Expunct comes of age (sorta)

Today is the proper one year anniversary of the launch of expunct. It's been a rollercoaster but we wanted to create a site to...

We Can Help Salon Out Here Over Abortion And The Biden Administration

It's entirely true that abortion is one of those difficult questions. It's even true that the answers rather divide Americans. However, it's still possible...

Nick Dearden Really Is A Ghastly Oik

Dearden is from Global Justice Now - the usual bunch of Trots who never quite have left mother's basement. Their political views haven't advanced...

So Here’s The Actual Complaint About Amazon’s Diversity

It's possible that Amazon is simply packed full of thuggish racists who delight in keeping the poor folk down. Possible, even if perhaps a...

Government Health Care Causes Corruption

This isn't what Transparency International quite means to say here but it is indeed what they are saying. Government provided health care leads to...

Recent comments