Home Economics The Resolution Foundation's Horror At The £8 Problem

The Resolution Foundation’s Horror At The £8 Problem



The Resolution Foundation has uncovered another of those things that just shame capitalism to its very core. It’s an £8 a year problem – truly something that means we should radically alter our society, right?

The actual problem identified is that companies have been gradually moving from weekly pay to monthly over the decades. This means that at any one time a worker has more wages outstanding that are owed to her – instead of, on average, being owed half a week’s money she’s owed half a month’s, obviously enough.

This is, I think we can all agree, an outrage:

The foundation gave the example of a worker earning £96 a week. “On any given day, they are owed an average of £48 by their employer if they are paid weekly, compared to £209 if they are paid monthly. In other words, being paid monthly means, on average, they are effectively lending an extra £161 to their employer compared to being paid weekly.

Well, OK, but how much of a problem is this? Apply an interest rate of 5% to that outstanding 161 quid for a year and we’ve got £8. Is this actually a problem? Even if it is, it’s an £8 problem, isn’t it?

“This shift has received no discussion or debate, despite it being the equivalent of the lowest-paid workers on average lending their employers an extra £120 million.” It noted that in the United States the poorest generally were paid weekly.

Not so much actually, it’s usually fortnightly over there.

Bt what are we to do about such trivia? The argument made is that all should have the ability to ask for weekly wages. Which doesn’t really work – what is the extra cost to an employer of running extra cheque runs – OK, bank deposit runs these days – and calculating stuff weekly not monthly? I’m willing to bet that the cost of processing a payroll is more than 15 pence per person (£8 divided by 52 weeks) meaning that such a change would actually decrease the money pot available for paying wages.

As ever in matters of the economy there’s a lot that happens out there and most of it doesn’t matter a damn – or, more accurately here, has already been solved. The optimal answer for the system as a whole is where the interest losses to the worker equal the costs of payroll preparation.

- Advertisement -


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here


in British English
expunct (ɪkˈspʌŋkt)
VERB (transitive)
1. to delete or erase; blot out; obliterate
2. to wipe out or destroy

Support Us

Recent posts

It’s The Consumer That Wins In Markets, Not The Supplier

The European Union has just had one of those lessons in freemarket capitalism that so many dislike. That it's the consumer that benefits from...

Finally The Woken SS Are Waking Up To Fast Fashion

It's taken them all long enough but finally the philosphically fashionable have finally woken up to what fast fashion means. Well, they've managed to...

The Difference Between Immigration And Asylum

There's a certain blurring here of the point of the system: People seeking asylum in the UK and Europe on the grounds of sexual orientation...

The Runnymede Trust And The Rugby Football Union

The Runnymede Trust is agitating for the Rugby Football Union to make more intensive studies of how many BAEM folk there are playing the...

If Only Polly Toynbee Actually Understood Anything

Polly Toynbee tells us that there should be a wealth tax. To, umm, well, do something or other: But what if, with one bound, we...

Recent comments