Home Economics The Failure Of The European Superleague Means We Need EU And Bureaucratic...

The Failure Of The European Superleague Means We Need EU And Bureaucratic Control Of Sports



There’s a certain misunderstanding of the way that markets work here. But then of course the argument is coming from France where they don’t particularly understand such things anyway. It’s unkind but not entirely untrue to insist that Bastiat was the last Frenchman who understood economics.

The European Superleague was an attempt to create a cartel of sports teams. To replicate the American system whereby owners are, through the restriction of competition, able to extract significant profits from their ownership of sports teams. This didn’t strike all that many – other than the owners of the sports teams that would be involved – as being all that good an idea.

OK, fair enough, the idea then died entirely within two days of its announcement. That would seem to be that. Except, of course, it isn’t:

France urged the European Commission to assume new powers to regulate football yesterday amid fallout across the continent from the unravelling the Super League plan.

This is to entirely misunderstand how markets work.

President Macron’s ministers seized on the row to press their case for the EU to wrench football in particular and sport in general out of the hands of capitalists and to place it under bureaucratic control. Roxana Maracineanu, the sports minister, said that the French system, which involves administrative supervision of sporting federations, should be extended across the EU. “We have to invent at a European level a special relationship between the EU and the sporting movement,” she said.

Well, yes, again that French thing of not understanding the liberty of markets.

So let us strip this right back to basics. Some folks floated a bad idea. Because everyone was free to engage, or not engage, with the idea and its promoters the idea failed within 48 hours. Bad idea suffers a painful death and that’s the end of that.

All of which is proof of the efficacy of markets free of bureaucratic control, isn’t it? The rapid death and bankruptcy of a stupid idea is a benefit of the system that caused that looming rigor mortis.

Think on for a moment. Given that there’s only us humans around here to have ideas there is going to be a consistent stream of right stinkers being proposed. What we desire – need – is a system that shoots down the bad ones and allows the very few good to prosper. What do we have in evidence here? That the current system of economic liberty does that for us.

Which is why the French propose that we must abandon it see above about Bastiat. But there’s no reason for the rest of us to go insane along with them.



Comments are closed.


in British English
expunct (ɪkˈspʌŋkt)
VERB (transitive)
1. to delete or erase; blot out; obliterate
2. to wipe out or destroy

Support Us

Recent posts

Agatha has been published.

Aunt Agatha has been published (the money came from an anonymous donor). It was £2500+ If you'd like a copy, donate £10+ and you'll get...

American Hyperconsumerism Is Killing Fewer People!

This report does not say what the Guardian headline writers think it does: Three Americans create enough carbon emissions to kill one person, study finds The...

Contracts Often Lag New Revenue Streams

I've been - vaguely and not with any great interest - anticipating a story like this: Scarlett Johansson sues Walt Disney over Marvel’s Black Widow...

Richard Murphy Rediscovers Monetarism

We have a delightful example of how Richard Murphy simply doesn't understand the basic nuts and bolts of the economics he wants to impose...

Vox Is Missing The Point About Having A Constitution

Not that we should be all that surprised by this from the progressives at Vox. No government- well, no one not controlled by...

Recent comments