Home Economics Meg Hillier - And The Public Accounts Committee - Are Insane

Meg Hillier – And The Public Accounts Committee – Are Insane

Author

Comments

The Public Accounts Committee – led by Meg Hillier who manages to make even Dame Margaret, Lady Hodge, look good – has managed to fall over their own ignorance into actual insanity:

As much as £50bn of cash is “missing” as the authorities cannot trace it and have no clear record of when it was most recently used, MPs have warned.

It amounts to around three-quarters of the £71bn of banknotes in circulation. The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) said the money could be used for overseas transactions and savings, stuffed under the mattress as savings in the UK, or potentially being used for illicit purposes. Only the remaining quarter is thought to be held for transactions.

OK.

Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, said: “£50bn of sterling notes – or about three quarters of this precious and dwindling supply – is stashed somewhere but the Bank of England doesn’t know where, who by or what for – and doesn’t seem very curious. It needs to be more concerned about where the missing £50bn is.

Ignorance, sheer, gasping, ignorance.

The total value of banknotes in circulation has almost tripled from just over £24bn in 2000 to more than £70bn in 2020, despite cash use halving from about six in 10 transactions in 2009 to three in 10 last year.

That’s not a dwindling supply, is it?

So, to basic economics. The price of money has changed. You know that, right? You now know more than the people who aim to account the country, the PAC.

Interest rates – the price of money – have fallen. Back 15 years you could get 5% by exchanging cash for bonds, or savings accounts and the like. So, incentives matter. People would, when they had some spare cash, pop it into some interest bearing investment or hidey hole. Now interest rates are nothing. Lend to the government and they might actually be charging you. Cash now pays a better interest rate – nothing is better than minus – than many of those former hidey holes and absolutely no homes for cash equivalent savings make it worth the while bothering.

So, the hidey hole is now the back of the sofa.

This is just obvious. Change the price of cash as against near cash equivalents and the demand for cash and near cash equivalents changes. Anyone who doesn’t get this shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near the public finances let alone the PAC.

And now to slightly more sophisticated economics. The Bank of England makes a considerable profit out of issuing bank notes. It’s called seigniorage. Adding 10 pence of ink to 5 pence of paper then selling it for £50 is profitable. That profit is fed straight back to the Treasury. What the BoE makes out of it I don’t know but the US Federal Reserve makes perhaps $20 billion a year out of doing something similar – with $ not £, obviously. This is pure profit.

Now the PAC is complaining about the government making a profit out of the monopoly of making legal tender? The Public Accounts Committee is?

Seriously, can we get these folks lobotomies so we can get their intellects up into the sort of range usual for human beings?

SUPPORT US WITH A SUBSCRIPTION?

4 COMMENTS

  1. When I was first on a local government finance committee two lifetimes ago, the discussions thrown about left me floundering, wondering how I was so lost that public accounts were so different from accounts as I knew it as I’d done privately. That very basic Accounting For Small Businesses course I’d done at the Chamber of Commerce must have left so much out. Basic things like the direction of time being backwards on the statements, graphs where “good” randomly changed from upwards to downwards. Then I realised it wasn’t me, it was them.

  2. This is clearly an intentionally timed and alarmist media rubbish for the sole purpose of laying the groundwork for CBDC mass perception. Such blatant propaganda pushing from the PAC is worrying, no doubt the carrot of CBDC totalitarian-esque control and tracking of how people spend money is blinding them. We should all carefully watch what our elected representatives are saying on this topic.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

expunct

in British English
expunct (ɪkˈspʌŋkt)
VERB (transitive)
1. to delete or erase; blot out; obliterate
2. to wipe out or destroy

Support Us

Recent posts

American Hyperconsumerism Is Killing Fewer People!

This report does not say what the Guardian headline writers think it does: Three Americans create enough carbon emissions to kill one person, study finds The...

Contracts Often Lag New Revenue Streams

I've been - vaguely and not with any great interest - anticipating a story like this: Scarlett Johansson sues Walt Disney over Marvel’s Black Widow...

Richard Murphy Rediscovers Monetarism

We have a delightful example of how Richard Murphy simply doesn't understand the basic nuts and bolts of the economics he wants to impose...

Vox Is Missing The Point About Having A Constitution

Not that we should be all that surprised by this from the progressives at Vox. No government- well, no one not controlled by...

So Let’s Have An Elitist Technocracy Instead!

There's been a certain amount - OK, a lot - of squealing in the US about how democracy is the ultimate value and we...

Recent comments