Home Economics Easyjet And The Vileness Of The European Union

Easyjet And The Vileness Of The European Union

Author

Comments

It is, of course, possible to think that less war in Europe would be a good idea although don’t propose that to anyone who has just met a Parisian. So, the idea that there should be n organisation aiming at less war in Europe, like the EU says it is, seems fair enough.

Then we get to see what it is that the EU actually does:

EasyJet is preparing to strip British and other shareholders of their voting rights to avoid breaching strict EU ownership rules.

Brussels’ rules dictate that airlines operating in the European bloc must be majority-owned by European Union investors – but at present only 47pc of its stock is owned by backers in the bloc.

If you fly people in and out of the EU you can be owned by anyone. But if you fly people within it then you must be that 50% EU owned.

Why?

Well, the people who run EU airlines think that if those nasty Yanks came over then they’d, the local, all go bust. Because the Yanks would provide better, cheaper, airline services than the EU types can. Therefore EU types must be protected at the expense of EU consumers.

And that’s it. It is to protect the producers at the expense of consumers.

Which is, of course, vile, yet it’s the motivating factor for the EU itself. People must be taxed for eating Argentinian beef because it’s nice and nice and cheap. Cane sugar must be taxed because it is cheaper than the chemically identical beet sugar produced by EU farmers. The entire economic structure is a zollverein. That is, while it has free trade – with regulation and oh aren’t there regulations – internally the aim is to protect inefficient domestic producers from those nasty foreigners. The people who suffer from this being the average EU citizen.

Thank God we’re leaving, eh?

SUPPORT US WITH A SUBSCRIPTION?

3 COMMENTS

Comments are closed.

expunct

in British English
expunct (ɪkˈspʌŋkt)
VERB (transitive)
1. to delete or erase; blot out; obliterate
2. to wipe out or destroy

Support Us

Recent posts

Agatha has been published.

Aunt Agatha has been published (the money came from an anonymous donor). It was £2500+ If you'd like a copy, donate £10+ and you'll get...

American Hyperconsumerism Is Killing Fewer People!

This report does not say what the Guardian headline writers think it does: Three Americans create enough carbon emissions to kill one person, study finds The...

Contracts Often Lag New Revenue Streams

I've been - vaguely and not with any great interest - anticipating a story like this: Scarlett Johansson sues Walt Disney over Marvel’s Black Widow...

Richard Murphy Rediscovers Monetarism

We have a delightful example of how Richard Murphy simply doesn't understand the basic nuts and bolts of the economics he wants to impose...

Vox Is Missing The Point About Having A Constitution

Not that we should be all that surprised by this from the progressives at Vox. No government- well, no one not controlled by...

Recent comments