Home Economics Britain Is Already Equal Enough, No More Need Be Done

Britain Is Already Equal Enough, No More Need Be Done

Author

Comments

As we’re well aware the current cry is that inequality is at record levels and we really, must, just overturn the entirety of society to wipe this evil from the world. There are a number of problems with this idea, among them that those Jacobin attempts to overturn society have never really worked out well. It’s also true though that inequality isn’t at record levels.

Think through it for a moment. Think about Victorian levels – to which today is so often compared. To be poor was not to eat. Absent significant mental health or addiction problems no one cannot eat in our society. The same is true of clothing, of shelter and so on. Sure, some people have Primark sneakers and some have spare pairs of Air Jordans but that’s qualitatively different from some having shoes and others none.

Another way to look at this is that a century ago the poor did not own a telephone and only the very richest would make an international phone call. Today – well, OK the 2 billion of us in middle income and rich countries – all have the same access to free telecoms as Bill Gates. Well, assuming that Gates can bring himself to use Facebook that is. W£e might indeed have inequality of financial assets between us and Gates but we’ve got near none at over our access to other things. And I would submit that those other things are the rather more important parts of life as well.

Let us look at the actual numbers for the UK. Here’s the Office for National Statistics:

Overall, taxes and benefits continued to redistribute income from the richest to the poorest people in the FYE 2019; the ratio of average income between the richest and poorest fifth of people fell from 13.7 to 3.8 after accounting for all these redistributive measures.

Your nominal income is the amount of cash you get. Your real income is the amount you can consume. So, inequality in the UK is, between those top and bottom groups, 3.9 times when we measure by real incomes.

Is that too high or too low? Certainly, it’s nowhere near as high as it used to be under dear Queen Victoria, is it? Myself I’d say we’ve rather solved the inequality thing, time to go look at other problems.

SUPPORT US WITH A SUBSCRIPTION?

1 COMMENT

  1. “Another way to look at this is that a century ago the poor did not own a telephone and only the very richest would make an international phone call.”

    Oh, come on now Tim, I worked for GPO Telephones in the mid Sixties and few people had telephones at home but demand was beginning to accelerate now everyone had a fridge, a car and a TV. By the Seventies most people had a phone. As a junior manager I had a call from a concerned father whose daughter was going to France to check the dialling code for her to call the UK. Nobody in our office knew it. I phoned the International exchange in London and they had to call Paris to find out!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

expunct

in British English
expunct (ɪkˈspʌŋkt)
VERB (transitive)
1. to delete or erase; blot out; obliterate
2. to wipe out or destroy

Support Us

Recent posts

The Difficulty Isn’t New Ways Of Lending, It’s People Worth Lending To

A more basic and fundamental point to be made concerning this lovely Greenshill and Gupta story. The difficulty is not in finding new ways...

How Dare People Be This Damn Stupid About Net Zero Emissions?

Assume that climate change is a problem, that we're causing it, that something must be done. OK, so, the aim must be to reduce...

It’s not right to make the poorest pay tax

In the Telegraph is this claim: We have created a weird, through-the-looking-glass tax system where a tiny number of the highest earners have paid most...

To Wildly Speculate About Gupta And Greenshill

Greenshill is a company that provides trade finance. No, don't worry about the details, just accept that. Greenshill also seems to be going bust...

Apparently Elizabeth Warren Is As Dumb As A Brick Outhouse

The Senator wants to tell us that stock buybacks are not returning money to investors: “They got a little fluff-and-buff in their stock. And how...

Recent comments