Home Economics Binyamin Applebaum Tries Lucy Van Pelt Economics

Binyamin Applebaum Tries Lucy Van Pelt Economics



This is true, yes, but there’s a certain corollary to it:

So, if the value of the money paid back was considerably lower than the original value of the money paid in, who lost out? Those who paid the money in of course.

So, those who did the right thing. Those who saved and then invested in beating fascism through Liberty Bonds and the like. They got screwed, they got the shaft, didn’t they?

And what is Binyamin’s suggestion for future policy? That those who invest in the Green New Deal, or put their money into growing the American economy. Hell, just those who decide they’d like to save so as not to use the cat food aisle as their meat counter in old age, they are to get shafted again.

Sounds like a hell of a plan really.

But be not concerned. There’s a plan!

Well, yes. But once you inflation proof then inflating the debt away doesn’t work, does it?

Which is also what has already happened. We have inflation proofed Treasuries these days. Interest rates react much more sharply, much more quickly, to even hints of inflation. Significant portions of corporate financing are now on floating rate, not fixed, terms.

Why is this? Because the financial markets – which includes those hundreds of millions who saw granny getting screwed last time around – have been Charlie Brown approaching Lucy Van Pelt’s football before. And they ain’t gonna be again.

The net of all of this is that fooling everyone this time around is going to be a lot more difficult. But we still come back to the Applebaum Plan. Which is either that everyone paying for that lots of lovely government gets screwed by inflation, as with last time around, or everything is inflation proofed and the debt doesn’t in fact get inflated away.

But, you know, lots of lovely government is just such a wondrous thing that the American people should just bend over and lube up, right?



  1. Thought this Appelbaum character was some lunatic twitter, on the order of Tim’s boy, Murphy. Turns out he’s in the employ of the NY Times as an economics/finance writer. Claim to fame is stumbling over a US home builder’s selling houses to people who misrepresented their ability to repay mortgages during the Fannie/Freddie/CRA debacle.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here


in British English
expunct (ɪkˈspʌŋkt)
VERB (transitive)
1. to delete or erase; blot out; obliterate
2. to wipe out or destroy

Support Us

Recent posts

Expunct comes of age (sorta)

Today is the proper one year anniversary of the launch of expunct. It's been a rollercoaster but we wanted to create a site to...

We Can Help Salon Out Here Over Abortion And The Biden Administration

It's entirely true that abortion is one of those difficult questions. It's even true that the answers rather divide Americans. However, it's still possible...

Nick Dearden Really Is A Ghastly Oik

Dearden is from Global Justice Now - the usual bunch of Trots who never quite have left mother's basement. Their political views haven't advanced...

So Here’s The Actual Complaint About Amazon’s Diversity

It's possible that Amazon is simply packed full of thuggish racists who delight in keeping the poor folk down. Possible, even if perhaps a...

Government Health Care Causes Corruption

This isn't what Transparency International quite means to say here but it is indeed what they are saying. Government provided health care leads to...

Recent comments