Home Economics American Manufacturing Doesn't Need Revitalising

American Manufacturing Doesn’t Need Revitalising

Author

Comments

The American Prospect tells us that Joe Biden will be real good for American manufacturing. Because, apparently, spending money on more expensive supplies of whatever is a good thing. The base problem here though is more fundamental:

This is a revolutionary challenge, not just to Trump—but to decades of bipartisan trade policy that sold out American industry. If put into practice, Biden’s plan just might make American manufacturing great again.

American manufacturing is great, it’s never stopped being great either. Thus it doesn’t need reviving either.

We can see this from output:

It’s at, or at least very near, all time highs. We can’t even say that manufacturing is more stable than services because that variance in output is greater than that in GDP over the business cycle.

So what is it that needs to be revitalised? Perhaps it’s employment?

Sure, there’s that Covid-19 spike to think about but we can’t be running industrial policy over short term issues like that. We had full employment before all of this. Which brings us to this:

Perhaps for some reason it’s just thought good that there should be more people employed in manufacturing? But that comes with a problem. If we’re – normally, OK – at full employment then why would we want more people to be employed in manufacturing? Doing so would mean that we’ve got to take people away from producing other things that we obviously desire. Sure, maybe the country would be better with fewer haircuts and more swamp coolers but who is it that gets to decide that? Most of us would think that it should be consumers who do. Not journalists at least and involving politicians in such personal preferences would seem a bit odd.

So, to have more people in manufacturing for some purpose or other what is it that we’re going to give up by taking people away from making them? And do note that we can and do import manufactures while services are rather more difficult to put into a box and ship.

Perhaps manufacturing pays more so this would raise all American wages?

No, that doesn’t work either.

It’s mystifying therefore. It’s just generally assumed that more people bashing things is better. Not that it is but that’s the insistence.

Maybe The American Prospect just has the hots for Richard Trumka, who the hell knows?

SUPPORT US WITH A SUBSCRIPTION?

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

expunct

in British English
expunct (ɪkˈspʌŋkt)
VERB (transitive)
1. to delete or erase; blot out; obliterate
2. to wipe out or destroy

Support Us

Recent posts

Incentives Matter – Even With The Environment

One of the things the economically literate have been trying to point out to varied environmentalists is that the first great lesson of economics...

If Only The Guardian Knew Anything About Tax

The Guardian treats us to a report about how HMRC is going after footballers. Well, OK, fair enough. The background here is that it...

Pauline Kael Is What’s Wrong With The American Media

Upon the election of Nixon Pauline Kael said "But I didn't know anyone who voted for Nixon!". This being used as the perfect exemplar...

You’re Allowed Your Own Views But Not Your Own Facts

The American left has never had - and this is a view of course - all that close a connection with reality. But we...

Dear Forbes, This Isn’t How It Works

If even the "capitalist tool" can't get the details of capitalism right then what hope for everyone else? This simply isn't true: Quicken Loans IPO...

Recent comments