Home Covid-19 More People Having The Coronavirus Is A Good Thing, Not A Bad

More People Having The Coronavirus Is A Good Thing, Not A Bad



There’s a certain, disturbing, inability of the press to get their heads around the thought that more people having the coronavirus is a good thing, not a bad. Thus the shocked tones with which this news is being greeted:

Over half the people living in the slums of Mumbai have had the coronavirus, according to a city-commissioned study that raises fresh doubts about India’s official case numbers.

India is already the third-worst hit country after the US and Brazil, with nearly 1.5 million cases, though experts have previously said the lack of testing could mean the true tally is much higher.

Blood tests on 6,936 randomly selected people conducted by Mumbai’s city authorities found that 57% of slum-dwellers and 16% of non-slum residents had virus antibodies, the study released on Tuesday said.

Mumbai, where about 40% of the population lives in slums, has reported just over 110,000 infections and more than 6,000 deaths so far.

The city of 20 million people is home to India’s largest slum, Dharavi, where an estimated million people live. But deaths in the sprawling slum have not exploded, with local officials saying their aggressive efforts to stem the spread of the virus has been effective.

One reason it’s a good thing is that it means the disease is less dangerous than we had thought. If a significant portion of the population has had it and there is no great uptick in corpses being tossed into coffins then this means that it is all less fatal than we had thought.

This is good, right? Sure, we don’t want yet another version of influenza floating around but if we did, well, it’s another version of influenza. Finding that tens of percents of the peeps have had it without that surge in deaths takes us closer to thinking that it might just be that other version of ‘flu.

The second good thing about this is that there are now, obviously, fewer people who can get it. We’re loser to that herd immunity, Or, if you prefer, now that fewer people can get it we can lighten up on the restrictions to make sure people don;t get it. This is also good.

Finally, having tested these thousands of people means that we’re, clearly, out there testing thousands of people. This is also a good thing.

Coronavirus is less dangerous than we had thought, we’re getting to grips with testing it and we can ease the lockdowns. These are reasons for celebration, not gloom.



  1. No, more people having had it is a disaster. As you point out, it means that it’s just another variant of flu. Which means that it can’t be used as an excuse to tear down society and rebuild it as Ingsoc without the joy and levity.

  2. We should not forget that eventually, we all die. However, I would like to remind Continental Telegraph readers (to say nothing of its journalists) that, in the UK, so far more people under the age of 60 have died of Covid-19 (according to ONS figures to week 29) than the total victims that died in the 9/11 terrorist attacks. That is 3,327 deaths versus 2,996. This with the first of those figures applying to a country with 0.9% of the world’s population – dying before reaching the age that is merely 73% of life expectancy.

    Further, we should also not forget that life expectancy in India is 68 years, compared to 83 in the UK. And the median age in India is 27.6 years (2016 figure), compared to 41.7 years in the UK (2018 figure). One might therefore expect Covid-19 deaths in India (on those two age profiles) to be much less than in the UK. Indians are already dying younger before Covid-19; and already dying less of Covid-19 because mostly much younger.

    Keep safe and best regards

  3. I’m dubious of just about any stats re: Kung Flu, we know in the U.S. the number of deaths have been deliberately inflated & now we’re hearing of widespread false positive test results.

    That said, it’s interesting to note that hydroxychloroquine is used widely in India.

    Re: Tim’s main point, the media seem only able to view the news re: Kung Flu as bad. If tomorrow everyone on Earth had had it & it was over the headlines would still be alarming “Covid-19 at an all-time high, women and minorities hardest hit!”


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here


in British English
expunct (ɪkˈspʌŋkt)
VERB (transitive)
1. to delete or erase; blot out; obliterate
2. to wipe out or destroy

Support Us

Recent posts

The BBC Isn’t Grasping This Economics Stuff

True, the World Economic Forum isn't grasping this economics stuff either but that's no excuse. The BBC's remit is to explain to us proles...

This Just In From An Economics Professor

It's all terrible that we measure the economy by what is actually produced, consumed, in the economy. We must, of course, start to measure...

What’s Wrong With Modern Monetary Theory?

Richard Murphy, he of the three professorial positions, asks us what is wrong with his exposition of Modern Monetary Theory. First, in a country...

BBC Chairman States The Blindingly Obvious

As a guide to the British media this isn't bad, even as it's blindingly obvious to any who is capable of thought: Only the over-50s...

Dear Lord Above How Ignorant Can These People Be?

So The American Prospect wants us all to think about paying care workers lots more money. They then bring in what they think is...

Recent comments