Home Class Politics The Stupidity Of Adding Ted Hughes To The Slavery List

The Stupidity Of Adding Ted Hughes To The Slavery List

Author

Comments

There does come a time when the fashionable nostrums of the age start to stink. Just such a whiff is perceptible with this declaration that Ted Hughes had connections to slavery:

The British Library has added the poet Ted Hughes to a dossier on links to slavery and colonialism based on the actions of an ancestor more than 300 years before his birth.

Despite the poet having humble origins, curators from the Library’s Printed Heritage Collections team have identified Hughes as part of research to find evidence of “connections to slavery, profits from slavery or from colonialism” among the former owners of items.

The offending relative is Nicholas Ferrar, born in 1592, whose family was “deeply involved” with the London Virginia Company set up to establish colonies in North America, the research says.

There are certain problems with the identification. The identification of someone who set up Virginia with slavery that is. The first recorded instance of chattel slavery in Virginia comes from the 1640s – before that it was indenture and on the same terms for people of whatever colour. Indenture being akin to apprenticeship in both terms an conditions and, importantly, in that it ended. Oh, and our first bloke who actually owned, rather than employed on one of those restrictive indenture contracts, someone was himself black, from Angola.

But there’s a larger problem. Assume we use Sir Pterry’s 30 years as a grandfather. 300 years means 10 generations. At that distance we all have 1024 ancestors in that generation of 300 years previously. Well, OK, fewer in Norfolk or among Hapsburgs but still. Given the population of 5.5 million for England back then that’s a 0.02% chance of any specific individual being one of our ancestors. That is, we’re getting very close to Heinz Kiosk territory, we are all guilty. Which might be the point.

To those of us still rational on the point this is no connection at all of course.

And of course there’s more than a little oddity about who is claimed to be connected with slavery. Boris Johnson has a very strong claim to be closely connected for example. He is, almost certainly, descended from a slave. Great great granny was one. You know, rather later than, or perhaps about the same time as, the abolition of slavery in the British Empire.

So who is to pay him compensation for the distress, unfairness and limitations of life choices?

There’s a lovely little coda to this:

The British Library has apologised to the widow of Ted Hughes after placing the poet on slavery dossier for the actions of an ancestor active 300 years before his birth.

Well, yes, and so they should. As above, the claim is that the ancestor was involved in the Virginia Company. Tsk. And yet:

He was tenuously tarred over his distant colonialist ancestor Nicholas Ferrar who died in 1637, centuries before Hughes was born, The Telegraph revealed.

Well, distant and all that, that’s why the apology. But there should be one for another reason too. Ferrar died before there was slavery in Virginia. That only started in the 1640s…..

SUPPORT US WITH A SUBSCRIPTION?

6 COMMENTS

  1. Ah, but notice the sleight of hand – “slavery and colonialism”. As with the Poundmetoo movement the Left makes a great deal of use of lumping horrible and rare behavior (rape) in with common behavior that ranges from tacky (or just overreaction) to seriously inappropriate.

  2. The enemy is satisfied that they can pin the first slave in Virginia to 1619. it’s a farrago of nonsense, but they are pleased with it.

    They’ve always been after Ted Hughes.

    He’s dead.

  3. And Ted Hughes always seemed such a nice chap. Literature is heavily populated by people who weren’t all that nice, but it’s their works we should be judging.

  4. Tim’s argument also proves that, as slavery was endemic in African societies, all blacks, those put on the boat and those left in Africa, are guilty of slavery.

    Of course all societies were slave societies if one goes back far enough. So we’re all GUILTY, GUILTY, GUILTY, especially those who complain about it since this means the EVIL obsession has survived in them to the present day.

    Or to put it another way, this is all bullshit.

  5. @Boganboy

    “Of course all societies were slave societies if one goes back far enough….”

    You hardly have to go back at all. Several existing societies still support slavery – there are slave markets in Libya, for instance. And we now have the concept of ‘modern slavery’, which simply meants not treating employees very well. Under that definition, Britain is still a slave-owning society – even ignoring the Arabs and Indians with their retinues of impressed servants….

  6. Dear Mr Worstall

    I hope that the British Library is looking at the past doings of ancestors of its staff, and indeed the founders of that august institution itself. We cannot have them looking for motes elsewhere, whilst they harbour planks, can we?

    When will they start burning books that mention slavery in anything other than a bad light? When will they burn books containing bad words like ‘nigger’? Surely the OED must be the first to go.

    DP

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

expunct

in British English
expunct (ɪkˈspʌŋkt)
VERB (transitive)
1. to delete or erase; blot out; obliterate
2. to wipe out or destroy

Support Us

Recent posts

American Hyperconsumerism Is Killing Fewer People!

This report does not say what the Guardian headline writers think it does: Three Americans create enough carbon emissions to kill one person, study finds The...

Contracts Often Lag New Revenue Streams

I've been - vaguely and not with any great interest - anticipating a story like this: Scarlett Johansson sues Walt Disney over Marvel’s Black Widow...

Richard Murphy Rediscovers Monetarism

We have a delightful example of how Richard Murphy simply doesn't understand the basic nuts and bolts of the economics he wants to impose...

Vox Is Missing The Point About Having A Constitution

Not that we should be all that surprised by this from the progressives at Vox. No government- well, no one not controlled by...

So Let’s Have An Elitist Technocracy Instead!

There's been a certain amount - OK, a lot - of squealing in the US about how democracy is the ultimate value and we...

Recent comments