Home Civil Liberty Should Facebook Obey The Law Or Not, You Vicious Colonialists?

Should Facebook Obey The Law Or Not, You Vicious Colonialists?



I think we’re all onboard with the idea that a company operating in a certain place should obey the law in that place? We are? Good.

Except that’s not actually the demand of the woke in this day and age. Apparently people should only obey the laws approved of by said woke.

Take, for example, Alex Cobham and the Tax Justice peeps. India has decided – for whatever reason, doesn’t matter – that investment poured into the country via Mauritius doesn’t pay tax in the same manner as that made more directly. This might be a good thing, might be a bad, that’s another matter. But this is what the Indian government has decided and has passed laws to make it so.

Yet when someone invests through Mauritius and thereby entirely and wholly obeys Indian tax law this is tax abuse and should not stand. Obeying laws that Alex Cobham and Tax Justice don’t like isn’t woke, d’ye see?

Amnesty International is doing the same here:

Facebook and YouTube are complicit in “censorship and repression on an industrial scale” in Vietnam, according to a report by Amnesty International that accuses the platforms of openly signalling that they are willing to bow to the wishes of authoritarian regimes.

Facebook’s executives have repeatedly promoted the platform as a bastion of “free expression”, but in Vietnam, where there is little tolerance for dissent, the company complied with hundreds of requests to censor content earlier this year. This includes peaceful criticism of the state by activists, which is protected under international human rights law.

We expect Facebook to obey English law here in England. Describing blokes in dresses as blokes in dresses is verging on a hate crime these days and we expect them to expunge hate crimes from their pages. Sure, we can agree or disagree with whether the blokes in dresses thing should be a hate crime or not but we do all agree that the laws of England apply to those who operate in England, yes?

OK. So too Vietnam. The laws of Vietnam apply to those operating in Vietnam. We can disagree with what those laws are, sure we can. I’m no more in favour of state censorship than anyone else. But to castigate Facebook for obeying local law is a rum do, eh?

Actually, it’s more than rum, it’s colonialism. Those stupid – browner, poorer, slant eyed – foreigners are too vicious and stupid to know what laws they should be applying. Therefore we edumacated scions of the western upper middle class should tell them what to do. To the extent of insisting that companies should not obey local law.

To argue that Vietnam shouldn’t have those laws is entirely fine and I’m with you. To argue that Facebook should break them is – well, would you like Facebook’s UK attitude to blokes in frocks to be defined by Vietnamese law? If not why not?



  1. Damned if I know what the attitude of the Vietnamese government is to blokes in frocks. Suspect it might be closer to mine than that of the woke.

    But I do agree with your basic point, Tim. Companies, and indeed Western tourists, have to obey the laws of wogland when they visit or operate in wogland.

    I’m thinking of some poor bloke who’s investigating the death of his daughter in Mozambique. I of course believe she was raped and murdered by some local thug because she had the temerity to be white. But he’s complaining that the Aussie government is doing nothing to bring the lout to justice.

    But of course Oz doesn’t rule Mozambique. And Oz’s no longer part of the Empire, and can’t ask Palmerston to send a gunboat.

    However Aussies, and I believe most Westerners, actually believe that decency, honesty and the rule of law exist outside a few white-ruled Western enclaves.

    I of course know better. I’m sure and certain that all these foul, foreign fiends are out to GET us.

  2. It’s Chinese Concession Territories all over again. How *DARE* you expect us to obey your laws when we are in your land! Donchaknow we’re British!/Get your hands off me, I’m an *AMERICAN!*

    • Yeah. I understand the Imamate of Yemen forbade white visitors because of just this problem.

      Of course all the immigrants swarming into Western countries have just the same attitude to our laws as we do to theirs.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here


in British English
expunct (ɪkˈspʌŋkt)
VERB (transitive)
1. to delete or erase; blot out; obliterate
2. to wipe out or destroy

Support Us

Recent posts

Biden’s $15 Minimum Wage Is Going To Be A Disaster

The effects of this rise in the Federal minimum wage to $15 are going to be slow in arriving, this is true. That's what...

Seriously Folks, Tech Company Taxation Is A Problem That’s Solved Already

It would be interesting if the pages of our national newspapers were less than four years out of date. Well, obviously, they're allowed to...

These Musicians’ Visas – This Is What The EU Imposes On Everyone

There's much complaining and wailing about the manner in which musicians and other luvvies no longer get to tour the remnant EU without having...

If The Vaccine’s Worth $32 Trillion Then Why Are We Whining About The Pharma Companies?

The existence of - prompted by the idea that it is subsequently used - a covid vaccine has value. You know, nice to be...

Those Brexit Lies, Daniel Lambert And The Wine Imports

Daniel Lambert is a wine importer who is more than a little pissed off at the new bureaucracy surrounding the importation of wine from...

Recent comments