Home Civil Liberty Should Facebook Obey The Law Or Not, You Vicious Colonialists?

Should Facebook Obey The Law Or Not, You Vicious Colonialists?



I think we’re all onboard with the idea that a company operating in a certain place should obey the law in that place? We are? Good.

Except that’s not actually the demand of the woke in this day and age. Apparently people should only obey the laws approved of by said woke.

Take, for example, Alex Cobham and the Tax Justice peeps. India has decided – for whatever reason, doesn’t matter – that investment poured into the country via Mauritius doesn’t pay tax in the same manner as that made more directly. This might be a good thing, might be a bad, that’s another matter. But this is what the Indian government has decided and has passed laws to make it so.

Yet when someone invests through Mauritius and thereby entirely and wholly obeys Indian tax law this is tax abuse and should not stand. Obeying laws that Alex Cobham and Tax Justice don’t like isn’t woke, d’ye see?

Amnesty International is doing the same here:

Facebook and YouTube are complicit in “censorship and repression on an industrial scale” in Vietnam, according to a report by Amnesty International that accuses the platforms of openly signalling that they are willing to bow to the wishes of authoritarian regimes.

Facebook’s executives have repeatedly promoted the platform as a bastion of “free expression”, but in Vietnam, where there is little tolerance for dissent, the company complied with hundreds of requests to censor content earlier this year. This includes peaceful criticism of the state by activists, which is protected under international human rights law.

We expect Facebook to obey English law here in England. Describing blokes in dresses as blokes in dresses is verging on a hate crime these days and we expect them to expunge hate crimes from their pages. Sure, we can agree or disagree with whether the blokes in dresses thing should be a hate crime or not but we do all agree that the laws of England apply to those who operate in England, yes?

OK. So too Vietnam. The laws of Vietnam apply to those operating in Vietnam. We can disagree with what those laws are, sure we can. I’m no more in favour of state censorship than anyone else. But to castigate Facebook for obeying local law is a rum do, eh?

Actually, it’s more than rum, it’s colonialism. Those stupid – browner, poorer, slant eyed – foreigners are too vicious and stupid to know what laws they should be applying. Therefore we edumacated scions of the western upper middle class should tell them what to do. To the extent of insisting that companies should not obey local law.

To argue that Vietnam shouldn’t have those laws is entirely fine and I’m with you. To argue that Facebook should break them is – well, would you like Facebook’s UK attitude to blokes in frocks to be defined by Vietnamese law? If not why not?



  1. Damned if I know what the attitude of the Vietnamese government is to blokes in frocks. Suspect it might be closer to mine than that of the woke.

    But I do agree with your basic point, Tim. Companies, and indeed Western tourists, have to obey the laws of wogland when they visit or operate in wogland.

    I’m thinking of some poor bloke who’s investigating the death of his daughter in Mozambique. I of course believe she was raped and murdered by some local thug because she had the temerity to be white. But he’s complaining that the Aussie government is doing nothing to bring the lout to justice.

    But of course Oz doesn’t rule Mozambique. And Oz’s no longer part of the Empire, and can’t ask Palmerston to send a gunboat.

    However Aussies, and I believe most Westerners, actually believe that decency, honesty and the rule of law exist outside a few white-ruled Western enclaves.

    I of course know better. I’m sure and certain that all these foul, foreign fiends are out to GET us.

  2. It’s Chinese Concession Territories all over again. How *DARE* you expect us to obey your laws when we are in your land! Donchaknow we’re British!/Get your hands off me, I’m an *AMERICAN!*

    • Yeah. I understand the Imamate of Yemen forbade white visitors because of just this problem.

      Of course all the immigrants swarming into Western countries have just the same attitude to our laws as we do to theirs.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here


in British English
expunct (ɪkˈspʌŋkt)
VERB (transitive)
1. to delete or erase; blot out; obliterate
2. to wipe out or destroy

Support Us

Recent posts

In Praise Of Benign, Even Helpful, Beneficial, Tax Competition

Richard Murphy tells us that it is not possible for there to be anything other than harmful tax competition. All such competition must, by...

If Women Working Causes Inflation Then Women Must Be Less Productive Workers Than Men

Over at Politico there is the assertion that one reason for past inflation was that women joined the workforce. If there are more people...

The Point Of Inventions Is To Be Able To Use Them, Not Sell Them

This is a common complaint about the British economy, that we can invent things but don;t then go on to make fortunes out of...

An Interesting Method Of Avoiding Tax Rises – Just Borrow

Those progressives over at American Prospect, it is possible to wonder whether they've quite got the basics of how the economy works at times. So,...

The Truth About Biden’s Tax Plan – It’s Based Upon Lies

So Richard Murphy told us how lovely the Biden corporate tax plan is over at FT Alphaville. I pointed out in the comments that...

Recent comments