Home Business It's The Consumer That Wins In Markets, Not The Supplier

It’s The Consumer That Wins In Markets, Not The Supplier

Author

Comments

The European Union has just had one of those lessons in freemarket capitalism that so many dislike. That it’s the consumer that benefits from this socioeconomic system, not the supplier. Entirely contrary to the soft Marxism that underpins so much of modern liberal thought it’s the buyer, not the seller, that benefits.

Brussels will allow firms on the Continent to continue using London’s vital clearing services after the Brexit transition ends in a victory for the City.

European Commission vice-president Valdis Dombrovskis said the bloc will introduce “time limited” provisions from January next year to ensure firms are still able to access the capital’s clearing houses, middlemen which handle trillions of pounds of trades each year and are a crucial part of the global financial system.

Brussels did not confirm how long the arrangement will last. It will kick in if the UK and the European Union fail to reach a Brexit deal.

The decision is likely to be seen as a climbdown by EU chiefs, who have long resented Britain’s dominance in clearing.

There’s a lot of bruised amour propre on that EU side. What really grates for them is that the centre of the euro wholesale markets is in London – a place that is not, as we all know, in the euro. They’ve tried to do various things about this too. Insist, for example, that those euro clearing markets must be in countries where the European Central Bank is that central bank. This doesn’t work even as an argument but they’ve tried it.

Some of them truly cannot understand why the financiers would rather work in a global megacity like London rather than some provincial backwater like Frankfurt. Or in rampagingly free markets rather than well regulated ones as in France. There’s even mystification at the idea that people would prefer to trade somewhere with the rule of law rather than bureaucrats doing what seems best at the time.

But what’s happening here is a welcome wake up call from reality. It’s as Our Merv – Mervyn King that is – has pointed out. The people who benefit from the euro services of the City are not the suppliers in the City – although they hope to make a profit, obviously – but the customers who get the euro services. This is why those customers are willing to pay the fees, because they judge the services to be worth more than what they’re charged.

Thus the argument about City access to Europe is put the correct way around. This isn’t about whether firms in the City can sell into Europe. It’s about whether corporates in Europe can gain access to the financial services they desire and need. And once it is put this correct way around then the answer is obvious, isn’t it? European should have free access to The City. And those bruised egos of the European regulators be damned.

SUPPORT US WITH A SUBSCRIPTION?

2 COMMENTS

  1. We should all remember that “cheap” meant “market” and has since been used to describe low prices that benefit the consumer because competitive markets resulted in lower prices to the consumers’ benefit whereas monopolies favoured the seller.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

expunct

in British English
expunct (ɪkˈspʌŋkt)
VERB (transitive)
1. to delete or erase; blot out; obliterate
2. to wipe out or destroy

Support Us

Recent posts

American Hyperconsumerism Is Killing Fewer People!

This report does not say what the Guardian headline writers think it does: Three Americans create enough carbon emissions to kill one person, study finds The...

Contracts Often Lag New Revenue Streams

I've been - vaguely and not with any great interest - anticipating a story like this: Scarlett Johansson sues Walt Disney over Marvel’s Black Widow...

Richard Murphy Rediscovers Monetarism

We have a delightful example of how Richard Murphy simply doesn't understand the basic nuts and bolts of the economics he wants to impose...

Vox Is Missing The Point About Having A Constitution

Not that we should be all that surprised by this from the progressives at Vox. No government- well, no one not controlled by...

So Let’s Have An Elitist Technocracy Instead!

There's been a certain amount - OK, a lot - of squealing in the US about how democracy is the ultimate value and we...

Recent comments