Home Business In Praise Of Vulture Capitalism

In Praise Of Vulture Capitalism



The Telegraph seems a little confused over how the world works.

It’s classic vulture capitalism: cynical and self-interested. The pair can put away their red capes.

So, what is it they’re doing? Slipping the odd granny into the horses they’re boiling up for glue?

Well, no. They’re noting that the world has changed and then adapting to that changed world:

The structure of the buyout mirrors the one that enabled Simpson to take over Bonmarché, Ponden Home and Edinburgh Woollen Mill in January. Three hundred stores were kept open, but not before 270 were closed for good. And Day may not be pulling the strings at head office any more but he remains involved, again as a senior creditor.

This isn’t some act of corporate altruism from the tycoon and his right-hand man. Quite the opposite. Management have picked over the carcass again, selected the best bits for themselves, and are jettisoning the rest so they can start afresh.

Hmm, OK, so what’s wrong with this idea?

Start from where we are. Much shopping has moved online. There’s a certain oversupply of physical retail services therefore. We need some system of sorting through what is still required as is and what needs to become something else.

Any system of economic management is going to face the same problem. Some hundreds of those clothes shops are not required as clothes shops. Any system of economic management is also going to come to the same conclusions – keep those which, by their sales, cover their costs of operation, do not keep those that don’t. There is nothing capitalist about this – John Lewis, a workers cooperative, is doing the same thing.

A rational and central planner would do the same thing. Close the shops that sell one scarf a week and keep open those that ship a containerload of schmutter in an afternoon.

That is, there’s nothing capitalist about this in the slightest. So, why’s the Telegraph complaining there is?



  1. ‘That is, there’s nothing capitalist about this in the slightest. So, why’s the Telegraph complaining there is?’

    Presumably so the necessary reorganisation can be blamed on wicked capitalists rather than benevolent bureaucrats.

  2. Also standard operating procedures in the Building Societies sectors. If a society went under, other societies would gather around the corpse, extract the viable bits to protect the membership, and jettison the poison.

  3. The Telegraph has really gone right down the pan if its chief city commentator either a) has zero understanding of business or b) is a frothing lefty who is quite happy to misrepresent standard business practice to his readers.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here


in British English
expunct (ɪkˈspʌŋkt)
VERB (transitive)
1. to delete or erase; blot out; obliterate
2. to wipe out or destroy

Support Us

Recent posts

In Praise Of Benign, Even Helpful, Beneficial, Tax Competition

Richard Murphy tells us that it is not possible for there to be anything other than harmful tax competition. All such competition must, by...

If Women Working Causes Inflation Then Women Must Be Less Productive Workers Than Men

Over at Politico there is the assertion that one reason for past inflation was that women joined the workforce. If there are more people...

The Point Of Inventions Is To Be Able To Use Them, Not Sell Them

This is a common complaint about the British economy, that we can invent things but don;t then go on to make fortunes out of...

An Interesting Method Of Avoiding Tax Rises – Just Borrow

Those progressives over at American Prospect, it is possible to wonder whether they've quite got the basics of how the economy works at times. So,...

The Truth About Biden’s Tax Plan – It’s Based Upon Lies

So Richard Murphy told us how lovely the Biden corporate tax plan is over at FT Alphaville. I pointed out in the comments that...

Recent comments