Home Business Congratulations To California - They'v Made Dealing Drugs Unprofitable

Congratulations To California – They’v Made Dealing Drugs Unprofitable

Author

Comments

We must line up and applaud – perhaps go outside and bang pots and pans – this astonishing performance by the California bureaucracy. They’ve managed to make drug dealing unprofitable.

No, not in that expected return sense, of death or imprisonment making it not worth the candle. But they’ve actually made it a not profitable enterprise to sell drugs to people. Cash coming in is less than cash going out. Which, given the hunger, lust even, for psychoactive substances among many of our confreres is astonishing.

Especially given their method. They simply made it legal then added the tender ministrations of the California bureaucracy to the enterprise. That’s some achievement:

Additionally, the state is shelling out $100 million to help businesses navigate its regulatory labyrinth.

It is to giggle. They’ve managed to take it even further than that. The state is having to subsidise the drug sellers to deal with the paperwork about selling drugs:

Many cannabis growers, retailers and manufacturers have struggled to make the transition from a provisional, temporary license to a permanent one renewed on an annual basis — a process that requires a costly, complicated and time-consuming review of the negative environmental effects involved in a business and a plan for reducing those harms.

It’s nothing – nothing – but the piles of paperwork necessary to do business in California.

Up in Northern California you can go out into the forests and raise a few acres of pot and make a very, very good profit indeed smuggling that down into the urban areas. In the south you can find it as ditchweed – literally, just stuff growing wild. And anywhere at all it takes about 5 minutes to stick some seed in a plant pot and then wait.

California has made it too expensive to do this legally.

After the laughing though think through this a little more. How much richer would everyone be if that regulatory burden weren’t applied to absolutely everything else that is done in the state?

SUPPORT US WITH A SUBSCRIPTION?

4 COMMENTS

Comments are closed.

expunct

in British English
expunct (ɪkˈspʌŋkt)
VERB (transitive)
1. to delete or erase; blot out; obliterate
2. to wipe out or destroy

Support Us

Recent posts

Agatha has been published.

Aunt Agatha has been published (the money came from an anonymous donor). It was £2500+ If you'd like a copy, donate £10+ and you'll get...

American Hyperconsumerism Is Killing Fewer People!

This report does not say what the Guardian headline writers think it does: Three Americans create enough carbon emissions to kill one person, study finds The...

Contracts Often Lag New Revenue Streams

I've been - vaguely and not with any great interest - anticipating a story like this: Scarlett Johansson sues Walt Disney over Marvel’s Black Widow...

Richard Murphy Rediscovers Monetarism

We have a delightful example of how Richard Murphy simply doesn't understand the basic nuts and bolts of the economics he wants to impose...

Vox Is Missing The Point About Having A Constitution

Not that we should be all that surprised by this from the progressives at Vox. No government- well, no one not controlled by...

Recent comments