Home Black Lives Matter Of Course BLM Is Different From The Capitol - Of Course It...

Of Course BLM Is Different From The Capitol – Of Course It Is

Author

Comments

It really is appalling how people try to conflate two entirely different things. People attempting to storm the Capitol is an affront to everything we hold dear. It’s a battle against democracy – as is even the thought that the affirmation of the Electoral College vote might not sail through. All of this is so much so that even the man who said everyone should stop should be impeached because, well, it’s important.

This is totally and vibrantly different from the Black Lives Matters protests. Entirely so. As CNN tells us:

People marched by the thousands in both after believing that a wrong had been done to them. The calls for racial justice across America over the summer were backed by the deaths of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor and the pain of following generations of anti-Blackness sentiment. Unlike BLM protests, the insurrection at the Capitol was triggered by lies and deeply rooted racist stereotypes, experts say.

Wonder what experts these are?

Rioters believed a narrative deeply rooted in racist stereotypes that has been consistent throughout Trump’s administration and used by other politicians in the past 50 years, according to Haney López, who is a law professor at the University of California, Berkeley.

That sounds rather more like hearsay than actual evidence.

Marc Morial, president and CEO of the National Urban League, said Wednesday the mob was motivated by racial resentment and “a conspiracy theory rooted in the effort to invalidate Black folks.”

A most independent and expert person.

“Once something like that feels true, you can’t dissuade them with the facts,” said Ian Haney López, the author of “Dog Whistle Politics: How Coded Racial Appeals Have Reinvented Racism and Wrecked the Middle Class.”

No evidence of bias or prior affiliation there at all.

What annoys here is that partisan political types are described as experts if they’re on one side of the argument. Drooling fascists if they on the other of course but that’s not the bit that grates. It’s the manner in which news reporting – which this is, it’s not an opinion piece – has stopped even having a pretence of balance.

If they said monobrow flathead says this, anti- flathead monobrow said that then they’d be closer to being impartial. And that’s what grates. The representatives of one particular political view – puffball noodle arms the lot of them – are presented as being experts.

SUPPORT US WITH A SUBSCRIPTION?

4 COMMENTS

  1. I read your four excepts, and I honestly don’t know which set of rioters he was describing. I can guess from the source, but exactly the same exact words would apply to either rioters.

    In fact, as the Capitol insurgents weren’t rioting, it takes several readings to convince myself that he’s *not* writing about the BLM rioters.

    Have I just been wooshed?

  2. The extent to which the old media in the U.S. have taken sides is stunning. They’ve long preferred Dems/left-wingers, but the willingness to do/say anything because OrangeManBad really does amaze. Trying to claim that belief in election fraud is racist, rather than based on video of suitcases of ballots being pulled out from under tables, windows covered up by cardboard, poll watchers being illegally denied access and hundreds (might be thousands) of sworn affidavits – I wonder if it’s reached the point now that they’re playing a game – let’s see who can say the most outrageous thing?

  3. The race mongers know the jig is up. Thinking people are on to their lies, their prevarications and their whining. The new tactic is to blame everything they don’t like on racism, everything. The thinking appears to be to overwhelm the public discourse with racism attacks such that any real observation and discussion is barred. Might work with the connivance of the popular media.

  4. “Once something like that feels true, you can’t dissuade them with the facts,”

    Quite. Like for example, the idea that young black men are at disproportionate risk from the police. It’s not true, and it *never* has been true. It might “feel true” – but it’s not; it’s out of whole cloth. But that lie has been used to justify riots, vandalism, and arson. It is difficult to distinguish between BLM (particularly given the coordination at both tactical and strategic level) and armed insurrection.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

expunct

in British English
expunct (ɪkˈspʌŋkt)
VERB (transitive)
1. to delete or erase; blot out; obliterate
2. to wipe out or destroy

Support Us

Recent posts

So Bjorn Lomborg Is Proven Right Once Again

Back when Bjorn Lomborg brought out the Sceptical Environmentalist my word how people laughed. He pointed out that well, actually, solar power had been...

So, That Answers The Question About Arun Advani Then

Arun Advani was on that Wealth Tax Commission. You know, the one that ended up saying that it would be just fine to have...

An Entirely Absurd Insistence About Oil Company Pay

The claim is that as oil company CEOs are paid with stock therefore they conspire to boil the planet. That is, no really, what...

Big Meat Is The Next Enemy After Big Oil

We would, perhaps, hope for a little more logical ability among those who write the newspapers and news sites for us. Take this example...

In Praise Of Benign, Even Helpful, Beneficial, Tax Competition

Richard Murphy tells us that it is not possible for there to be anything other than harmful tax competition. All such competition must, by...

Recent comments