Home Black Lives Matter Black History Is Indeed Important - We Should Get It Right

Black History Is Indeed Important – We Should Get It Right

Author

Comments

It’s Black History Month and so we’ve the usual clarion call that we must pay attention to black history. OK:

Every February, Americans are invited to think seriously about our nation’s history from the perspective of the African-American experience. Black history is profoundly illuminating: It produces a bright light by which we can make an honest assessment of how well our actions align with the ideals that have led us to proclaim that ours is a special nation. Black History Month is a time that dares us to think about the limitations of the Proud Boys’ white nationalism that excludes the diversity that is one of this country’s strengths. Similarly, it is a time that reminds us that the democratic ideals trumpeted by the 1776 Commission have not been applied equally.

Cool, so let’s try this out:

There are records of Black explorers in North America before the landing of the first slave ship in 1619, but that date serves as a powerful marker for the terms of the Black experience in what would become the United States. Black people arrived in servitude, and it became commonplace that they labored without compensation alongside poor white immigrants who came to the colonies as indentured servants. In response to labor shortages, English settlers soon created a system of racialized chattel slavery.

The terms and conditions of those first blacks were indeed the same as those first whites. Which is not a racial difference at all. It’s also insane to say that people working under an indenture recevied no compensation. Given the 7 year terms they’d have been dead a long time before the end if they gained no food, clothing or shelter.

Sure, food, clothing, shelter, they’re not money. Nor is the passage across the ocean money. But they are all compensation.

It’s also important to note that those first blacks were, in their home places of origin, slaves. And when they arrived in Virginia they became not-slaves – they became indentured labour just like the white folks around them. Those early days were in fact marked by their non-racism.

Further, it wasn’t quite the English settlers that developed the chattel slavery – it was one of those black importees from Africa. Yes, the first known owner of a chattel slave in Virginia was black. Actually, a bloke from Angola who arrived as indentured labour in 1620.

At which point we can indeed say that black history is important and that we can and should learn things from it. The problem with trying to do so in the New York Times is that what we do know about those early days is in direct opposition to what we’ve been told in the 1619 Project. Which, given that that’s a flagship production of the New York Times makes that newspaper a difficult place to utter truths, really.

SUPPORT US WITH A SUBSCRIPTION?

6 COMMENTS

  1. Never heard “invited to think seriously” used as a euphemism for obnoxiously shoved down our throats before. In addition to inventing an alternate history the New York Times seems bent on inventing an alternate English language.

  2. “Similarly, it is a time that reminds us that the democratic ideals trumpeted by the 1776 Commission have not been applied equally.” And which political party was to blame for most of that in the “Jim Crow” southern states?

  3. Yes, it was a free black, who had served his indenture (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Johnson_(colonist)), who turned another black, who had served past his indenture (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Casor), into a slave for life.

    1655 – “This was the first instance of a judicial determination in the Thirteen Colonies holding that a person who had committed no crime could be held in servitude for life.”

    Though, ctually, that determination was the first in a civil case. There were previous precedents (e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Punch_(slave)).

  4. There are records of Black explorers in North America before the landing of the first slave ship in 1619

    I assume this refers to explorers’ ships having black sailors, rather than leading expeditions.

    Morgan Freeman has Black History month right.

  5. Olaudah Equiano was able to buy himself out of slavery. Captain Jack Perkins took 315 enemy sail during the American War of Independence. The actual history has more nuance than the bullshit version.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

expunct

in British English
expunct (ɪkˈspʌŋkt)
VERB (transitive)
1. to delete or erase; blot out; obliterate
2. to wipe out or destroy

Support Us

Recent posts

Just How Stupid Can You Be About British Recovery Bonds?

This Starmer idea of British Recovery Bonds. Or, as Richard Murphy is claiming, his idea of stealing everyones' savings. It's possible to wonder at...

So How Do We Stop Big Business Lobbying Government?

Let's assume that we actually want to stop business - big business if you prefer - from lobbying government. We do have to assume...

The Usual Ghastly Nonsense About Fresh Water Fish

Or perhaps the usual ghastly nonsense about an environmental problem. They do this all the time. Take something which really is a problem in...

Aww, Bless, Dame Margaret, Lady Hodge, Doesn’t Understand Tax Incidence

This is somewhere between amusing and worrying: The Treasury has been urged to “step up and sort out” the digital services tax to close a...

There Are No Destitute People In The United Kingdom

We have a report out that insists that hundreds of thousands have been made destitute by the coronavirus. This is not actually true for...

Recent comments